Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of 164 F. App'x 990 (Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Alexander Schultz moves to dismiss this petition for review subject to reinstatement after his district court case is decided.
Schultz is challenging the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision in his case in both this court and the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Schultz asserts that discrimination issues are involved in his case. On October 18, 2005, this court ordered that this petition for review would be dismissed unless Schultz informed the court that he had dismissed his district court action challenging the Board’s decision. Schultz has not dismissed his district court action and moves to dismiss his petition here subject to reinstatement. We agree that dismissal is appropriate.
A petitioner may not proceed to challenge the Board’s decision in two different fora. Williams v. Department of the Army, 715 F.2d 1485 (1983) (en banc). Thus, this petition for review must be dismissed and the petition would not be subject to reinstatement.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Schultz’s motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for review is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
If the district court determines that the case is not a mixed case, it could transfer the district court action to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 F. App'x 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-ex-rel-schultz-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2006.