Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson

232 So. 2d 195
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1970·No. No. 69-359·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The mother recovered medical expenses and loss of services in her derivative claim of the negligent action of the defendant, appellee here. The minor recovered nothing for pain and suffering and appeals to this court.

We believe the case falls within the purview of Pickel v. Rosen, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 730. On the authority of Pickel we reverse on the matter of damages only and remand for a new trial so that the jury may determine the sole issue of the damage to the minor plaintiff. See also Griffis v. Hill, Fla., 230 So.2d 143, opinion filed ,T , ir, 1A,n November 19, 1969.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson, 232 So. 2d 195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

232 So. 2d 195 (Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adikes v. Carroll
235 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Smith v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
232 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)