Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson
This text of 232 So. 2d 195 (Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The mother recovered medical expenses and loss of services in her derivative claim of the negligent action of the defendant, appellee here. The minor recovered nothing for pain and suffering and appeals to this court.
We believe the case falls within the purview of Pickel v. Rosen, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 730. On the authority of Pickel we reverse on the matter of damages only and remand for a new trial so that the jury may determine the sole issue of the damage to the minor plaintiff. See also Griffis v. Hill, Fla., 230 So.2d 143, opinion filed ,T , ir, 1A,n November 19, 1969.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 So. 2d 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-ex-rel-schultz-v-donaldson-fladistctapp-1970.