Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson

232 So. 2d 195
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1970
DocketNo. 69-359
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 232 So. 2d 195 (Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schultz ex rel. Schultz v. Donaldson, 232 So. 2d 195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The mother recovered medical expenses and loss of services in her derivative claim of the negligent action of the defendant, appellee here. The minor recovered nothing for pain and suffering and appeals to this court.

We believe the case falls within the purview of Pickel v. Rosen, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 730. On the authority of Pickel we reverse on the matter of damages only and remand for a new trial so that the jury may determine the sole issue of the damage to the minor plaintiff. See also Griffis v. Hill, Fla., 230 So.2d 143, opinion filed ,T , ir, 1A,n November 19, 1969.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adikes v. Carroll
235 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Smith v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
232 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 So. 2d 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-ex-rel-schultz-v-donaldson-fladistctapp-1970.