Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc. v. State ex rel. De Lano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc. v. State ex rel. De Lano

890 S.W.2d 8, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1687, 1994 WL 593116

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 1994·No. No. 65677·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc., appeals from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis’ denial of its motion for leave to file appeal late, to set aside order, to grant any relief contemplated in Rule 74.06, or otherwise, which was filed in response to a judgment rendered in favor of respondents, State of Missouri, ex rel. Constance De Lano, deceased, and Missouri Commission on Hu[9]*9man Rights. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc., appeals from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis’ denial of its motion for leave to file appeal late, to set aside order, to grant any relief contemplated in Rule 74.06, or otherwise, which was filed in response to a judgment rendered in favor of respondents, State of Missouri, ex rel. Constance De Lano, deceased, and Missouri Commission on Hu[9]*9man Rights. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc. v. State ex rel. De Lano, 890 S.W.2d 8, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1687, 1994 WL 593116 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

890 S.W.2d 8 (Schultz Door Closer Service, Inc. v. State ex rel. De Lano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.