Schultheis v. State

65 So. 3d 1184, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574, 2011 WL 3055730
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schultheis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8133
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2011·No. 1D10-5041·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Todd Schultheis appeals the order denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The State concedes the case must be reversed because the trial court failed to set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law either on the record or in its order denying post-conviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d) (“If an evidentiary hearing is required, the court shall ... determine the issues, and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto.”); Thomas v. State, 954 So.2d 56, 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“[T]he trial court erred by failing to make any findings of fact — either orally or in writing.”); see also Kornegay v. State, 826 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schultheis v. State, 65 So. 3d 1184, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11574, 2011 WL 3055730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

65 So. 3d 1184 (Schultheis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kornegay v. State
826 So. 2d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Thomas v. State
954 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)