Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER
277 S.W.3d 290, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 2009 WL 113850
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff, Harry Schulte, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, SSM DePaul Health Center. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, 277 S.W.3d 290, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 2009 WL 113850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
277 S.W.3d 290 (Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Director of Revenue
277 S.W.3d 290 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)