Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER

277 S.W.3d 290, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 2009 WL 113850

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

DocketED 91287

StatusPublished

This text of 277 S.W.3d 290 (Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulte v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, 277 S.W.3d 290, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 2009 WL 113850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Harry Schulte, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, SSM DePaul Health Center. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Harry Schulte, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, SSM DePaul Health Center. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W.3d 290, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 2009 WL 113850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-ssm-depaul-health-center-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack