Schulte v. Schering
This text of 26 P. 78 (Schulte v. Schering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[129]*129The opinion of the court was delivered by
— The question raised in this case is in substance the same as that passed upon by us in McGlauflin v. Holman, at our May session, 1890. See 1 Wash. 239 (24 Pac. Pep. 439). There is an additional defect in this instrument in its not containing the name of one of the lessors in the granting clause, but this does not take it out of the principle recognized in the case cited. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded. The demurrer should be overruled, with leave to answer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 P. 78, 2 Wash. 127, 1891 Wash. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-schering-wash-1891.