Schulte v. Petruzzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schulte v. Petruzzi

149 A.D. 907, 133 N.Y.S. 503

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A.D. 907 (Schulte v. Petruzzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulte v. Petruzzi, 149 A.D. 907, 133 N.Y.S. 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff appeals from an order directing- him to serve a bill of particulars of certain allegations of the complaint. A consideration of the complaint shows that much of the information which the plaintiff is directed, to furnish is entirely unnecessary inasmuch as the information is sufficiently set forth in the complaint. The order appealed from, therefore, is modified by striking therefrom the paragraphs numbered I, II, III and Y, and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff appeals from an order directing- him to serve a bill of particulars of certain allegations of the complaint. A consideration of the complaint shows that much of the information which the plaintiff is directed, to furnish is entirely unnecessary inasmuch as the information is sufficiently set forth in the complaint. The order appealed from, therefore, is modified by striking therefrom the paragraphs numbered I, II, III and Y, and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D. 907, 133 N.Y.S. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-petruzzi-nyappdiv-1912.