Schulte v. Murtha

Fourth Circuit

Schulte v. Murtha

568 F. App'x 238

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-1908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carol Schulte appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schulte v. Murtha, No. l:12-cv-02919-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2013; June 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [239] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carol Schulte appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schulte v. Murtha, No. l:12-cv-02919-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2013; June 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [239] court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Schulte v. Murtha, 568 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 238 (Schulte v. Murtha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related