Schulte v. Frazee

123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 496
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 27, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 858 (Schulte v. Frazee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulte v. Frazee, 123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 496 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an action for malicious prosecution the defendant in error recovered a judgment against plaintiff in error in the sum of one thousand dollars for which final judgment was entered. Writ of error is taken to that final judgment, error being assigned on the denial of a motion *497 for a directed verdict and on certain alleged defects in the charge of the court.

We have examined the record and while we think the charge was defective we do not think the plaintiff successfully carried the burden of proving by preponderating evidence the concurrence of both malice and want of probable cause as prescribed by this Court' in Tatum Brothers Real Estate and Investment Company v. Watson, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. R. 623. For such reasons the judgment below must be and is hereby reversed.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis- and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Watson
109 So. 623 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 858, 98 Fla. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-frazee-fla-1929.