Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pedemode, Julius Grossman
195 N.E. 195, 266 N.Y. 550, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1439
Opinion
*552 Order affirmed, with costs. Fourth question certified answered in the negative; other questions not answered. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pedemode, Julius Grossman, 195 N.E. 195, 266 N.Y. 550, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1439 (N.Y. 1935).
195 N.E. 195 (Schulte Real Estate Co. v. Pedemode, Julius Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weisser v. Mursam Shoe Corporation
127 F.2d 344 (Second Circuit, 1942)