Schult v. H. & C. REALTY CORPORATION
148 A.2d 894, 29 N.J. 279
This text of 148 A.2d 894 (Schult v. H. & C. REALTY CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schult v. H. & C. REALTY CORPORATION, 148 A.2d 894, 29 N.J. 279 (N.J. 1959).
Opinion
MARY SCHULT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
H. & C. REALTY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Henry Shiffman and Messrs. Baker, Garber & Chazen for the petitioner.
Mr. Raymond L. Cunneen and Mr. Hugh J. O'Gorman for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schult v. H. & C. Realty Corp.
148 A.2d 894 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 A.2d 894, 29 N.J. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schult-v-h-c-realty-corporation-nj-1959.