Schult v. Albring
344 P.3d 32, 269 Or. App. 169, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 142
This text of 344 P.3d 32 (Schult v. Albring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schult v. Albring, 344 P.3d 32, 269 Or. App. 169, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
Opinion
Defendant appeals after the trial court entered a judgment of dismissal without prejudice that released a previously posted bond. A discussion of his contentions would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. It suffices to say that his appeal does not present a justiciable controversy and must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
344 P.3d 32, 269 Or. App. 169, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schult-v-albring-orctapp-2015.