Schult v. Albring

344 P.3d 32, 269 Or. App. 169, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 142
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 11, 2015·No. 08CV0066; A149090·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals after the trial court entered a judgment of dismissal without prejudice that released a previously posted bond. A discussion of his contentions would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. It suffices to say that his appeal does not present a justiciable controversy and must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schult v. Albring, 344 P.3d 32, 269 Or. App. 169, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 142 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

344 P.3d 32 (Schult v. Albring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.