Schulman v. Schulman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schulman v. Schulman

29 A.D.2d 950, 290 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 950 (Schulman v. Schulman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulman v. Schulman, 29 A.D.2d 950, 290 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation, defendant-husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 30, 1967, as awarded plaintiff (1) $100 per week for her support, (2) an interim counsel fee of $5,000 and (3) exclusive possession of the marital residence with a direction that defendant pay the carrying charges, including those for utilities. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding to the award for plaintiff’s support a provision that that award is pendente lite. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, -without costs. The terms of the award of support for plaintiff should be corrected to state that the award is pendente lite. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation, defendant-husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 30, 1967, as awarded plaintiff (1) $100 per week for her support, (2) an interim counsel fee of $5,000 and (3) exclusive possession of the marital residence with a direction that defendant pay the carrying charges, including those for utilities. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding to the award for plaintiff’s support a provision that that award is pendente lite. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, -without costs. The terms of the award of support for plaintiff should be corrected to state that the award is pendente lite. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 950, 290 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-schulman-nyappdiv-1968.