Schulman v. Riga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schulman v. Riga

243 A.D. 586

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence and is probably accounted for by the many references of plaintiff’s counsel to extraneous matters.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence and is probably accounted for by the many references of plaintiff’s counsel to extraneous matters.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Schulman v. Riga, 243 A.D. 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 586 (Schulman v. Riga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.