Schulman v. Ravenhue Dress, Inc.
This text of 140 Misc. 41 (Schulman v. Ravenhue Dress, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first cause of action could have been brought in the Municipal Court of the City of Mew York and is not properly a cause entitled to be placed on the Commercial Calendar, as the moving party avers. With respect to the second cause of action, it is not disputed that the breach of the contract of employment occurred on or about August 23, 1930, and that the action was commenced on or about September 25, 1930. In view of the fact that four months have not elapsed between the breach of the contract and the commencement of the action, this cause of action could not properly be placed on the Commercial Calendar. (City Court Rules, rule II, clause (b), June, 1930.) Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 Misc. 41, 250 N.Y.S. 385, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-ravenhue-dress-inc-nynyccityct-1931.