Schulman v. Neubardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schulman v. Neubardt

51 A.D.2d 1026, 381 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1026 (Schulman v. Neubardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulman v. Neubardt, 51 A.D.2d 1026, 381 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover moneys due under a partnership agreement and for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 24, 1975, which, inter alia, denied her motion to vacate defendants’ second demand for a bill of particulars. Order modified, by adding to the first decretal paragraph thereof, immediately after the word "denied”, the following: "except that items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 are deleted from the second demand for a bill of particulars.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The time within which plaintiff is to serve the bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The deleted items requested documents of public record, matters which were not referred to in the pleadings and an item which defendants could discover without further information from plaintiff. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover moneys due under a partnership agreement and for an accounting, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 24, 1975, which, inter alia, denied her motion to vacate defendants’ second demand for a bill of particulars. Order modified, by adding to the first decretal paragraph thereof, immediately after the word "denied”, the following: "except that items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 are deleted from the second demand for a bill of particulars.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The time within which plaintiff is to serve the bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The deleted items requested documents of public record, matters which were not referred to in the pleadings and an item which defendants could discover without further information from plaintiff. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1026, 381 N.Y.S.2d 421, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-neubardt-nyappdiv-1976.