Schulman v. Modern Industrial Bank

266 A.D. 833, 43 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4719
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 266 A.D. 833 (Schulman v. Modern Industrial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulman v. Modern Industrial Bank, 266 A.D. 833, 43 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and order and deny the motion on the ground that the allegation that plaintiff “ was served with a subpoena requiring his appearance for examination by the District Attorney of Bronx County, at the complaint of defendant herein,” coupled with the other allegations, set forth an interference with plaintiff’s person. The complaint is, therefore, sufficient. [178 Misc. 847.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salamanca Trust Co. v. McHugh
156 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Lincoln First Bank v. Siegel
60 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Atwood v. Kerlin
169 F. Supp. 135 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Luckett v. Cohen
169 F. Supp. 808 (S.D. New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D. 833, 43 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-modern-industrial-bank-nyappdiv-1943.