Schulman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.

259 A.D.2d 479, 684 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2037

This text of 259 A.D.2d 479 (Schulman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc., 259 A.D.2d 479, 684 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated March 6, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant provided evidence of excusable default and established a meritorious defense (see, Kirkaldy v Hertz Corp., 221 AD2d 599; Baldassarre v Morwil Supermarket, 203 AD2d 221). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldassarre v. Morwil Supermarket, Inc.
203 A.D.2d 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Kirkaldy v. Hertz Corporation
221 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 479, 684 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-associated-food-stores-inc-nyappdiv-1999.