Schulman v. 34th Street Partnership, Inc.
This text of 88 A.D.3d 459 (Schulman v. 34th Street Partnership, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The evidence, including that several years earlier defendant, as part of a business improvement district project, had the granite cornerstones installed on the sidewalk where plaintiff fell, was insufficient to show that defendant did not cause or create the dangerous and defective condition existing at the time of the accident (see Lebron v Napa Realty Corp., 65 AD3d 436 [2009]).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 A.D.3d 459, 930 N.Y.2d 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulman-v-34th-street-partnership-inc-nyappdiv-2011.