Schuler Rubber & Supply Co. v. Enterprise Electric Co.

10 Teiss. 135, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 20
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 27, 1913
DocketNo. 5704
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Teiss. 135 (Schuler Rubber & Supply Co. v. Enterprise Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schuler Rubber & Supply Co. v. Enterprise Electric Co., 10 Teiss. 135, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 20 (La. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

His Honor,

JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court as follows:

[136]*136Opinion and decree, January 27th, 1913. Rehearing refused February 10th, 1913.

Plaintiff sued for tiie sum of $129.38. Defendant answered admitting an indebtedness of $58.88 and pray.ing that.the balance be disallowed; thus leaving in dispute only $70.50.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for, defendant appeals.

In Valdejo vs. Zeigler, 7 Court of Appeal, p. 319, this Court held, that:

“Where an answer contains such a confession of liability as to leave in dispute less than $100 exclusive of interest and costs, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain an appeal.”

The principle was reaffirmed in Borde vs. Lazarus, 7 Court of Appeal, p. 337; and when that case found its way to the Supreme Court the principle was there also approved. (See, 127 La., 122.)

Appellee has answered the appeal as frivolous, praying for damages. But since we are without jurisdiction to pass upon the appeal itself, we are equally without jurisdiction to entertain an answer thereto.

McLeod vs. Simonton, 39 An., 853.

Being without jurisdiction ratione materiae 'we- can make no other disposition of the case than to strike it from óur docket (or transfer-it to some Court having jurisdiction; and in this case, there is none). '' "

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borde v. Lazarus
53 So. 465 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Teiss. 135, 1913 La. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuler-rubber-supply-co-v-enterprise-electric-co-lactapp-1913.