Schuholz v. Walker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Schuholz v. Walker

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 711

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 17, 1923

DocketNo. 2228

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 711 (Schuholz v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuholz v. Walker, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 711 (Ohio Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

BUCHWALTER, J.

Epitomised Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

Schuholz, a subcontractor, brought an action against Anna Walker et al for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. Schuholz contracted with one Stella Runyan, a former owner of the property, who after the house was built conveyed same to the Walkers. Demurrer to to the petition was sustained by the Common Pleas, to which ruling error was presented by Schuholz. Affirming, the Court of Appeals held:

The sole question for determination is upon whom the affidavits should be served. The “owner of the property” in 8310 and 8320 GC. refers to the person who was owner when the contract was made and the lien must be filed against and copy of the affidavit served upon the owner at the time set forth and not a subsequent purchaser. Citing Gill v. Konvisser, 45 OCC. 839; 32 OCA. 542; Fisher v. Jacobs, 32 Dec. 34.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUCHWALTER, J.

Epitomised Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

Schuholz, a subcontractor, brought an action against Anna Walker et al for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. Schuholz contracted with one Stella Runyan, a former owner of the property, who after the house was built conveyed same to the Walkers. Demurrer to to the petition was sustained by the Common Pleas, to which ruling error was presented by Schuholz. Affirming, the Court of Appeals held:

The sole question for determination is upon whom the affidavits should be served. The “owner of the property” in 8310 and 8320 GC. refers to the person who was owner when the contract was made and the lien must be filed against and copy of the affidavit served upon the owner at the time set forth and not a subsequent purchaser. Citing Gill v. Konvisser, 45 OCC. 839; 32 OCA. 542; Fisher v. Jacobs, 32 Dec. 34.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuholz-v-walker-ohioctapp-1923.