Schuh v. D'Oench

51 Ill. 85
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Ill. 85 (Schuh v. D'Oench) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schuh v. D'Oench, 51 Ill. 85 (Ill. 1869).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The only error assigned on this record is, that the court below rendered judgment by default when defendant’s demurrer to the declaration had not been determined. The demurrer was filed on the 7th of April, and the default was entered on the same day. But there is nothing in the record from which it can be determined which was the prior act. Had the clerk kept a minute book in which he had noted each step taken in the progress of the business of the court, in the order in which it occurred, there would have been no difficulty in knowing which was the precedent act. But in the absence of such an entry, we are left to conjecture alone, and it would not be proper for us to presume merely from the fact that both acts were of the same date, that the filing of the demurrer was prior in point of time. We must presume that the court below acted correctly, until error is shown to have been committed. And this record tails to show that any exists.

Had plaintiff in error, during the term, entered a motion to set aside the default, and proved that a demurrer had been filed in the case before the entry of the default, then the court would have set aside the default, and failing to do so, the motion and evidence could have been preserved in the record, and thus error would have been shown, and could have been availed of in this court. But no such steps were taken, and hence we cannot hold that there is error in this record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorn v. Bradner Smith & Co.
106 Ill. App. 91 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Utley v. Cameron
87 Ill. App. 71 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
McKenzie v. Wright McKenzie & Co.
80 Ill. App. 31 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Ill. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuh-v-doench-ill-1869.