Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schuessler v. Siminerio

Schuessler v. Siminerio

167 A.D.2d 339, 562 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13356
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 339 (Schuessler v. Siminerio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schuessler v. Siminerio, 167 A.D.2d 339, 562 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant "C” Town Supermarket from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated April 27, 1989.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for reasons stated by Justice Lerner at the Supreme Court (see, Ober v Rye Town Hilton, 159 AD2d 16). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ober v. Hilton
159 A.D.2d 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 339, 562 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuessler-v-siminerio-nyappdiv-1990.