Schuepler v. Evans

California Supreme Court

Schuepler v. Evans

4 Cal. 213

DecidedJuly 15, 1854

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cal. 213 (Schuepler v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuepler v. Evans, 4 Cal. 213 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

‘Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

[213]*213We are unable to discover by what particular rule of law or mode of reasoning the Court below arrived at the conclusion that it had no jurisdiction in this case. The [213] subject matter in * dispute, as well as the parties, seem to have been properly before it, and it was perfectly competent for the Court to have granted the- relief sought.

Judgment reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

‘Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

[213]*213We are unable to discover by what particular rule of law or mode of reasoning the Court below arrived at the conclusion that it had no jurisdiction in this case. The [213] subject matter in * dispute, as well as the parties, seem to have been properly before it, and it was perfectly competent for the Court to have granted the- relief sought.

Judgment reversed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuepler-v-evans-cal-1854.