Schuele v. Stratia Group Inc

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2005·No. 05-1274·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1274

AMY SCHUELE; DOUGLAS SCHUELE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

STRATIA GROUP, INCORPORATED; GREG BARRETT,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STRATIA EDUCATION, LLC; DANIEL E. HAUG; CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, INCORPORATED,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 2970-AMD)

Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark E. Herman, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Amy Schuele and Douglas Schuele appeal the district

court’s orders dismissing their complaint without prejudice based

on failure to serve process and denying their motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Schuele v. Stratia Group, Inc., No. CA-04-

2970-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuele v. Stratia Group Inc, (4th Cir. 2005).

Schuele v. Stratia Group Inc (Schuele v. Stratia Group Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.