Schuck v. Moore

1915 OK 519, 150 P. 461, 48 Okla. 533, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 664
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 29, 1915·No. No. 4611·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

The petition in error and appeal must be dismissed. It has repeatedly been held by this court that, where the record fails to contain a copy of the final order or judgment sought to be reviewed, and in which it is not made to appear that the same is of record in the trial court, no question is presented to this court for its determination, and the appeal will be dismissed. Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230, 54 P. 458; Dennyv. Wright, 13 Okla. 256, 74 P. 104; Ford v. McIntosh,22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543,117 P. 198; Brown v. Territory, 15 Okla. 362, 82 P. 647;Kansas City, M. O. Ry. Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164,124 P. 70.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 535

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuck v. Moore, 1915 OK 519, 150 P. 461, 48 Okla. 533, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 664 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 519 (Schuck v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willitt v. ASG Industries, Inc.
1978 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1978)
Poindexter v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.
1976 OK CIV APP 9 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1976)
Carson v. State Ex Rel. Dudley
1929 OK 237 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Anderson v. Stevenson
1929 OK 202 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Thomas v. Morgan
1928 OK 575 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs
1928 OK 427 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Merchants Southwest Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Johnston
1925 OK 782 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Lillard v. Meisberger
1925 OK 633 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Bulfinch v. Schatz
217 P. 983 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)
Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann
159 P. 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)