Schuchman v. Pittsburgh

41 A.2d 642, 351 Pa. 527
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 18, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.2d 642 (Schuchman v. Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schuchman v. Pittsburgh, 41 A.2d 642, 351 Pa. 527 (Pa. 1945).

Opinions

Our decision is that Ordinances No. 312 and No. 313 of the City of Pittsburgh set forth in the Bill of Complaint and the proposed official actions of Cornelius D. Scully, Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh, and Edward R. Frey, Controller of the City of Pittsburgh, of signing and counter-signing the bonds referred to in the ordinances named and the proposed sale by the City of Pittsburgh, and the Mayor and Controller thereof, of the bonds of that city, authorized by those ordinances, *Page 529 are not forbidden by the Constitution and are in accordance with the statutes of Pennsylvania, and the injunction which in the bill filed we are asked to issue against the City of Pittsburgh and the officials above named is therefore refused and the bill is dismissed. Each party to pay its own costs.*

An opinion discussing the questions involved in this case will be filed later.

* By order of the Court on March 22, 1945, costs in this proceeding were placed upon the City of Pittsburgh.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corporation for the Relief of Widows v. Philadelphia
176 A. 727 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Clark v. Philadelphia
196 A. 384 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Madden v. Borough of Mount Union
185 A. 275 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Ohlinger v. Maidencreek Township
167 A. 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Sinking Fund Commissioners v. Philadelphia
182 A. 645 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Cannon
162 A. 277 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Borough of Rainsburg v. Fyan
17 A. 678 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)
Brooke v. City of Philadelphia
29 A. 387 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Hirt v. City of Erie
49 A. 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Schuldice v. Pittsburg
82 A. 1125 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Campbell v. Wilkins Township
116 A. 823 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.2d 642, 351 Pa. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuchman-v-pittsburgh-pa-1945.