Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc.
This text of 261 So. 2d 162 (Schubowsky v. Hearn Food Store, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 So. 2d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schubowsky-v-hearn-food-store-inc-fla-1972.