Schubert v. DeMarco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schubert v. DeMarco

476 So. 2d 241, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2111, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15744

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1985

DocketNo. 85-610

StatusPublished

This text of 476 So. 2d 241 (Schubert v. DeMarco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schubert v. DeMarco, 476 So. 2d 241, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2111, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We quash the decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity and direct that the final judgment of the county court in favor of the petitioners be reinstated. The county court rejected an estoppel claim by respondents and we believe the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, deviated from the essential requirements of the law when it held that there was no evidentiary support for the county court’s ruling.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We quash the decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity and direct that the final judgment of the county court in favor of the petitioners be reinstated. The county court rejected an estoppel claim by respondents and we believe the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, deviated from the essential requirements of the law when it held that there was no evidentiary support for the county court’s ruling.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 So. 2d 241, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2111, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schubert-v-demarco-fladistctapp-1985.