Schubert v. Bull

Saratoga Chancery Court

Schubert v. Bull

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 33, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 312

DecidedAugust 6, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 33 (Schubert v. Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schubert v. Bull, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 33, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 312 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Application to discharge ne exeat. The chancellor decided that the fact that the legislature has abolished arrest in all actions upon tract affords no ground for coming into this court for the mere purpose of holding the defendant to bail upon a ne exeat. That to-authorize the court to entertain jurisdiction and to grant a ne exeat, there must be other grounds of equitable relief than the mere object of holding the defendant to bail.

Ne exeat discharged, with costs to be taxed; upon the matter of the bill alone and because complainant has an adequate remedy by suit at law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application to discharge ne exeat. The chancellor decided that the fact that the legislature has abolished arrest in all actions upon tract affords no ground for coming into this court for the mere purpose of holding the defendant to bail upon a ne exeat. That to-authorize the court to entertain jurisdiction and to grant a ne exeat, there must be other grounds of equitable relief than the mere object of holding the defendant to bail.

Ne exeat discharged, with costs to be taxed; upon the matter of the bill alone and because complainant has an adequate remedy by suit at law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 33, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schubert-v-bull-nychanctsara-1844.