Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc.

255 A.D. 1012, 8 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 1012 (Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc., 255 A.D. 1012, 8 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Action for damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff when she was passing through a revolving door at an entrance to the defendant’s hotel. The issues were submitted to the jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Prom the judgment entered upon that verdict, and also from an order denying defendant’s motions to dismiss, made, respectively, at the close of the plaintiff’s case and at the close of the entire proofs, defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order dismissed. Plaintiff was a guest at defendant’s hotel on the evening of the day of the Army-Notre Dame football game — November 16, 1935. The Army team was stopping at the same hotel. A large number of people congregated in the corridors. They were laughing, joking, quite gay and hilarious. The plaintiff was injured when certain other guests, running, knocked her to the floor of the lobby by pushing a revolving door violently against her. There was no attendant at the door, supervising its operation. Defendant offered no evidence as to the accident. It contends that the denial of its motion to dismiss the complaint was error. In the circumstances disclosed, the case was properly submitted to the jury, implicit in whose verdict is a finding that the defendant failed to exercise ordinary care. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that defendant hotel was not required to guard its guests against the sudden and unexpected prank of hoodlums. [168 Misc. 431.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens v. DeKalb Medical Center, Inc.
557 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Eleanor M. Stagl v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
52 F.3d 463 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Ward v. State
81 Misc. 2d 583 (New York State Court of Claims, 1975)
Watson v. Adirondack Trailways
45 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Vale v. Yawarski
78 Misc. 2d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)
Litz v. Hutzler Brothers Co.
314 A.2d 693 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Gannon v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance
34 Misc. 2d 365 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Cejka v. R. H. Macy & Co.
3 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Paul v. Staten Island Edison Corp.
2 A.D.2d 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Burgess v. Garfield 49th Street, Inc.
1 Misc. 2d 60 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Covey v. State
200 Misc. 340 (New York State Court of Claims, 1951)
Glennon v. James McCreery & Co.
271 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Tyrrell v. Quigley
186 Misc. 972 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Levy v. Cascades Operating Corp.
176 Misc. 373 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Hart v. Hercules Theatre Corp.
258 A.D. 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 1012, 8 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schubart-v-hotel-astor-inc-nyappdiv-1938.