Schruben v. Johnson

113 So. 640, 94 Fla. 204
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 13, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

*205 Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Buford, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schruben v. Johnson, 113 So. 640, 94 Fla. 204 (Fla. 1927).

113 So. 640 (Schruben v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Pontious
123 So. 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)