Schron v. Kirschenbaum
248 A.D. 699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 699 (Schron v. Kirschenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schron v. Kirschenbaum, 248 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Action to recover damages for fraudulent representations alleged to have been made by defendant in a transaction involving the sale of a luncheonette stand to plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff after trial at Trial Term without a jury unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schron-v-kirschenbaum-nyappdiv-1936.