Schroetenboer v. Bultman

Michigan Supreme Court

Schroetenboer v. Bultman

253 Mich. 108

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 1931

DocketDocket No. 15, Calendar No. 35,021

StatusPublished

This text of 253 Mich. 108 (Schroetenboer v. Bultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schroetenboer v. Bultman, 253 Mich. 108 (Mich. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

North, J.

The.opinion handed down herewith in Timmerman v. Bultman, ante, 99, is controlling in the instant case. The record is remanded to the circuit court with direction to set aside the judgment heretofore entered in favor of defendants and to enter judgment therein in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants for $666, with interest at five per cent, per annum” computed from January 23, 1927. Plaintiffs will have costs of both courts.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North, J.

The.opinion handed down herewith in Timmerman v. Bultman, ante, 99, is controlling in the instant case. The record is remanded to the circuit court with direction to set aside the judgment heretofore entered in favor of defendants and to enter judgment therein in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants for $666, with interest at five per cent, per annum” computed from January 23, 1927. Plaintiffs will have costs of both courts.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 Mich. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroetenboer-v-bultman-mich-1931.