Schroeppel v. Jewell
This text of 1 Cow. 208 (Schroeppel v. Jewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Were the second cause terminated, by the entry of a judgment upon the verdict, that would, doubtless, be an extinguishment of the judgment in this cause. But a case has been regularly made, upon which the party may move for a new trial. Jewell must await the result of that proceeding. It will be a satisfaction, or not, according to the event. The application is premature.
Rule refused.
Had the balance been found for the defendant, in the second action, whether the Court would order satisfaction, even after judgment ? Quare. (Vid. Mumford v. Stocker, ante, 178.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cow. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeppel-v-jewell-nysupct-1823.