Schroeder v. West
Opinion
ORDER
In his brief, the appellant has, inter alia, moved for an initial decision by the full Court on the issue of whether a duty to assist attaches pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 5107(a) pri- or to the submission of a well-grounded claim. However, the Court notes that the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Epps v. Gober, 126 F.3d 1464, 1468 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom. Epps v. West, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2348, 141 L.Ed.2d 718 (1998) (mem.), expressly rejected the appellant’s contention in this case, and that that case is binding on this Court.
[185] On consideration of the foregoing and the record on appeal, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
12 Vet. App. 184 (Schroeder v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.