Schroeder v. United States

87 F. 201, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2569
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 8, 1898·No. No. 2,586·Published

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The article in question consists of those portions of the leaf tobacco which break off in handling the tobacco before it is stemmed or in the process of stripping. It falls [202]*202on the floor, and is swept up, and is used for the same purposes as original leaf tobacco. It is used as filler tobacco, and is known as “scrap filler.” It is unnecessary to consider all the questions presented by the elaborate briefs and arguments of counsel. Upon the argument of this case, I was inclined to affirm the decision of the board of general appraisers in conformity with the opinion of the court of appeals in Sheldon v. U. S., 5 C. C. A. 282, 55 Fed. 818. But I have been unable to distinguish the material issues herein from those involved in Seeberger v. Castro, 153 U. S. 32, 14 Sup. Ct. 766, where the supreme court of the United States decided that tobacco sweepings such as those in question herein were “waste.” I think that opinion is controlling upon the issues herein, and for that reason the decision of the board of general appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schroeder v. United States, 87 F. 201, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2569 (circtsdny 1898).

87 F. 201 (Schroeder v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seeberger v. Castro
153 U.S. 32 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Sheldon v. United States
55 F. 818 (Seventh Circuit, 1893)