Schroeder v. State

950 So. 2d 438, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 2007 WL 397060
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 2007
DocketNo. 4D07-95
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 950 So. 2d 438 (Schroeder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schroeder v. State, 950 So. 2d 438, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 2007 WL 397060 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Yisrael v. State, 938 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Scanes v. State, 876 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

GUNTHER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NEW YORK BUFFET v. Certain Underwriters
950 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 So. 2d 438, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 2007 WL 397060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.