Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises

410 A.2d 281, 171 N.J. Super. 584, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 412
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 16, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the time limitation for the commencement of suit expressly incorporated in the terms and conditions of a “passage contract” (passenger ticket) for a cruise on shipboard, to which terms and conditions the attention of the passenger is plainly and definitely directed by an “IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PASSENGERS” printed on the cover and reciting acceptance of those terms and conditions by the passenger, controls as a matter of law. In entering summary judgment for defendant, the trial judge answered that [586]*586question in the affirmative. We agree. Geller v. Holland-America Lines, 201 F.Supp. 508 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d 298 F.2d 618 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 370 U.S. 909, 82 S.Ct. 1256, 8 L.Ed.2d 403 (1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises, 410 A.2d 281, 171 N.J. Super. 584, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 412 (N.J. Ct. App. 1980).

410 A.2d 281 (Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mirra v. Holland America Line
751 A.2d 138 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Hallman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
459 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)