Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises

410 A.2d 281, 171 N.J. Super. 584, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 412
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 16, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 410 A.2d 281 (Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schroeder v. Holland-America Cruises, 410 A.2d 281, 171 N.J. Super. 584, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 412 (N.J. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the time limitation for the commencement of suit expressly incorporated in the terms and conditions of a “passage contract” (passenger ticket) for a cruise on shipboard, to which terms and conditions the attention of the passenger is plainly and definitely directed by an “IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PASSENGERS” printed on the cover and reciting acceptance of those terms and conditions by the passenger, controls as a matter of law. In entering summary judgment for defendant, the trial judge answered that [586]*586question in the affirmative. We agree. Geller v. Holland-America Lines, 201 F.Supp. 508 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d 298 F.2d 618 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 370 U.S. 909, 82 S.Ct. 1256, 8 L.Ed.2d 403 (1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirra v. Holland America Line
751 A.2d 138 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Hallman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
459 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 A.2d 281, 171 N.J. Super. 584, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-holland-america-cruises-njsuperctappdiv-1980.