Schroeder v. Harris
This text of 45 N.W. 4 (Schroeder v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal, upon questions of law alone, from a judgment rendered in justice’s court. We have carefully examined the very full and complete record of the proceedings in the trial court, and it is manifest that no error can be found therein. If, therefore, the district court committed a mistake in dismissing the appeal, as to which we express no opinion, it was without prejudice to the appellant. Instead of having the justice’s judgment affirmed, as it should have been on the record, there was simply a dismissal of the appeal. Of this result the appellant ought not to complain.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 N.W. 4, 43 Minn. 160, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-harris-minn-1890.