Schroeder v. Dime Savings Bank
This text of 254 A.D. 590 (Schroeder v. Dime Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for an accounting of the rents and profits received by defendant mortgagee prior to foreclosure, plaintiffs, the former owners of the mortgaged premises, claim that the mortgagee unlawfully entered the premises and collected rents. The defendant claims its acts were done with the consent and acquiescence of plaintiffs. Judgment in favor of defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 590, 4 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-dime-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1938.