Schroeder v. Colbert County

66 Ala. 137
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 66 Ala. 137 (Schroeder v. Colbert County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schroeder v. Colbert County, 66 Ala. 137 (Ala. 1880).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suits caunot, generally, be maintained against a county, until the claim or demand has been, within the period prescribed by the statute (Code of 1876, § 832), presented to the Commissioners Court of the county, and disallowed in whole or in part. — Code of 1876, § 2903. A claim against the county, for damages sustained from the falling of a public bridge, is of the class which must be presented to the Court of County Commissioners for allowance, before it can be made the subject of suit.—Barbour County v. Horn, 41 Ala. 114. The Court of County Commissioners is prohibited from passing upon or allowing any claim against the county, unless it is itemized and stuorn to by the claimant, or some person in his behalf having personal knowledge of the facts.-r-Gode of 1876, § 827. The liability of the county to suit is statutory, and unless all the pre-requisites of the statute are observed, suits against it cannot be maintained. It would require the largest liberality and latitude of construction to deduce from the averments of the complaint the existence of a claim for which the county is chargeable. But, if that can -be done, there is a want of an averment that the claim was itemized and verified, as required, when presented to the Commissioners Court. If not so itemized and verified, they could not pass upon or allow it; and the disallowance of it may well be referred to its insufficiency in this respect.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCarroll v. City of Bessemer
268 So. 2d 731 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Merrill v. Blount County
133 So. 2d 212 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Moore v. Stephens
84 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Sossaman v. Stone
178 So. 18 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Slayton & Co. of Toledo v. Winston County
24 F.2d 761 (Fifth Circuit, 1928)
Board of Com'rs of Rogers County v. Baxter
1925 OK 925 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
City of Birmingham v. Prickett
92 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Jones v. Jefferson County
89 So. 174 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Calhoun County v. Watson
44 So. 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)
Rumsey & Co. v. City of Bessemer
138 Ala. 329 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)
Scarbrough v. Watson
140 Ala. 349 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)
Washington County v. Porter
128 Ala. 278 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Barrett v. City of Mobile
129 Ala. 179 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Roberts v. Cleburne County
116 Ala. 378 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Crenshaw County v. Sikes
113 Ala. 626 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Lee County v. Yarbrough
85 Ala. 590 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Ala. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-colbert-county-ala-1880.