Schroeder v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Schroeder v. City of New York

189 N.E.2d 622, 12 N.Y.2d 997

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schroeder v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.Y.2d 522 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1963·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur so as to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States (see 371 U. S. 208) granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment reversed in [998]*998accordance with the mandate of .the Supreme Court of the United States, with costs in all courts, and the matter remitted to Special Term, Sullivan County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said mandate. [See 10 N Y 2d 522.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur so as to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States (see 371 U. S. 208) granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment reversed in [998]*998accordance with the mandate of .the Supreme Court of the United States, with costs in all courts, and the matter remitted to Special Term, Sullivan County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said mandate. [See 10 N Y 2d 522.]

Schroeder v. City of New York, 189 N.E.2d 622, 12 N.Y.2d 997 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

189 N.E.2d 622 (Schroeder v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related