Schroeder v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Schroeder v. City of New York

189 N.E.2d 622, 12 N.Y.2d 997

DecidedFebruary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E.2d 622 (Schroeder v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schroeder v. City of New York, 189 N.E.2d 622, 12 N.Y.2d 997 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur so as to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States (see 371 U. S. 208) granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment reversed in [998]*998accordance with the mandate of .the Supreme Court of the United States, with costs in all courts, and the matter remitted to Special Term, Sullivan County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said mandate. [See 10 N Y 2d 522.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur so as to conform to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States (see 371 U. S. 208) granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide as follows: Judgment reversed in [998]*998accordance with the mandate of .the Supreme Court of the United States, with costs in all courts, and the matter remitted to Special Term, Sullivan County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with said mandate. [See 10 N Y 2d 522.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.E.2d 622, 12 N.Y.2d 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack