Schroeder v. Board of Parole

479 P.3d 628, 308 Or. App. 659
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 21, 2021
DocketA169257
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 479 P.3d 628 (Schroeder v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schroeder v. Board of Parole, 479 P.3d 628, 308 Or. App. 659 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Argued and submitted November 19, 2020, affirmed January 21, 2021

JOHN PAUL SCHROEDER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A169257 479 P3d 628

David Sherbo-Huggins, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services. John Paul Schroeder filed a sup- plemental brief pro se. Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Kirsten M. Naito, Assistant Attorney General. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Green v. Board of Parole, 308 Or App 159, 478 P3d 608 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hessel v. Board of Parole
345 Or. App. 781 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2025)
State v. Richardson
479 P.3d 628 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 P.3d 628, 308 Or. App. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-2021.