Schroeder v. Benson

292 A.D.2d 438, 738 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2503

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated May [439]*43921, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Lisa Schroeder did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Lisa Schroeder did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Thus, it was incumbent on the plaintiffs to come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955). The plaintiffs failed to do so (see, Taylor v Jerusalem Air, 280 AD2d 466; Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79, 84). Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schroeder v. Benson, 292 A.D.2d 438, 738 N.Y.S.2d 874, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 438 (Schroeder v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaddy v. Eyler
591 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Grossman v. Wright
268 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Taylor v. Jerusalem Air, Inc.
280 A.D.2d 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)