Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins.

27 A. 1077, 158 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1614
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 13, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 197
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 27 A. 1077 (Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins., 27 A. 1077, 158 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1614 (Pa. 1893).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

One of the stipulations contained in the contract sued on is : “ The entire policy shall be void .... if the interest of the insured be not truly stated therein ; .... or if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership.” The uncontradicted evidence was that the title to the property was in the plaintiff and his wife jointly. This, in the absence of any proof of fraud or mistake, as to the insertion of the stipulation above quoted, was a flat bar to plaintiff’s recovery. There was therefore no error in directing a verdict for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benchoff v. Paradise Mutual Insurance
14 Pa. D. & C.2d 763 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1958)
Craigmile v. Sorenson
80 N.W.2d 45 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1956)
Kanefsky v. National Commercial Mutual Fire Insurance
35 A.2d 766 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Huber v. Penn Mutual Fire Insurance
33 A.2d 729 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1943)
Pollock v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
199 N.E. 816 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1935)
Lilleback v. Lincoln Fire Insurance
162 So. 866 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Valenti v. Imperial Assurance Co.
176 A. 413 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1935)
Porobenski v. American Alliance Insurance
176 A. 205 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Henry v. First & Farmers National Bank & Trust Co.
18 Pa. D. & C. 548 (Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Fulbright v. Phoenix Insurance
44 S.W.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1931)
Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. McNeil
35 F.2d 675 (Sixth Circuit, 1929)
Western Assurance Company v. White
286 S.W. 804 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
Turner v. Home Insurance
189 S.W. 626 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1916)
Wilson v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
96 A. 540 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Schiavoni v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance
48 Pa. Super. 252 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Lehman v. Lancaster County Mutual Insurance
45 Pa. Super. 375 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Rochester German Ins. Co. of Rochester v. Schmidt
162 F. 447 (Fourth Circuit, 1908)
Beddall v. Citizens Insurance
28 Pa. Super. 600 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Kompa v. Franklin Fire Insurance
28 Pa. Super. 425 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Elliott v. Teutonia Insurance
20 Pa. Super. 359 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A. 1077, 158 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroedel-v-humboldt-fire-ins-pa-1893.