Schrock v. SAIF Corp.
This text of 814 P.2d 562 (Schrock v. SAIF Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Workers’ Compensation Board did not err in upholding employer’s denial of chiropractic treatment.
Employer rescinded its denial of ultrasound treatment at the hearing, and claimant sought attorney fees under ORS 656.386. After the Board’s decision denying attorney fees, the legislature amended ORS 656.386 to allow for attorney fees in this type of situation. That amendment applies retroactively to cases in which the order was not final on or before the effective date of the act. SB 540, § 3 (1991).
Reversed in part and remanded for award of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 P.2d 562, 108 Or. App. 472, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1224, 1991 WL 160669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schrock-v-saif-corp-orctapp-1991.