Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co.

1922 OK 358, 210 P. 1024, 88 Okla. 34, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 12, 1922·No. 12388·Published

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

This case is presented on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal, the ground of such motion being that the appeal is frivolous, and for delay only.

The action was upon a written instrument and an account duly verified. The answer was an unverified general denial. The-trial court sustained the motion of the plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings. The execution of the written instrument and the correctness of the account not being put in issue by the answer, the action of the trial court in sustaining the motion for judgment on the pleadings was proper.

It is apparent (hat the appeal is frivolous. .Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

HARRISON, C. J., and McNEILL, MILLER, KENNAMER, and COCHRAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co., 1922 OK 358, 210 P. 1024, 88 Okla. 34, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 320 (Okla. 1922).

1922 OK 358 (Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.