Schrimpe v. Eich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schrimpe v. Eich

47 A.D.2d 938, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9402

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 938 (Schrimpe v. Eich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schrimpe v. Eich, 47 A.D.2d 938, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 2, 1974, in favor of defendants, upon a jury verdict following a trial on the issue of liability. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. This appeal presented no fact questions. Reversible error was committed when the trial court, in charging the jury, declared that the infant plaintiff had herself been negligent. While the court was careful to point out the requirement of a causal connection between such negligence and the occurrence of the accident, the charge, as given and objected to, unnecessarily prejudiced the plaintiffs’ case by supplying a crucial element to a jury finding of contributory negligence on the part of the infant plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello,,Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 2, 1974, in favor of defendants, upon a jury verdict following a trial on the issue of liability. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. This appeal presented no fact questions. Reversible error was committed when the trial court, in charging the jury, declared that the infant plaintiff had herself been negligent. While the court was careful to point out the requirement of a causal connection between such negligence and the occurrence of the accident, the charge, as given and objected to, unnecessarily prejudiced the plaintiffs’ case by supplying a crucial element to a jury finding of contributory negligence on the part of the infant plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello,,Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 938, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schrimpe-v-eich-nyappdiv-1975.