Schricker Vs. Schricker

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: November 5, 2021
• Docket: 83631
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DONALD R. SCHRICKER, No. 83631 Appellant, vs. CHERYL JOY SCHRICKER, FILED Respondent. NOV 0 5 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY 5.YDEPUT4ILEI -Airir

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order denying reconsideration of an order regarding the valuation of real property in a divorce action. Second Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Washoe County; Tamatha Schreinert, Judge. Preliminary review of the documents on file in this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. First, an order denying a motion for reconsideration is not substantively appealable. See Arnold v. Kip, 123 Nev. 410, 417, 168 P.3d 1050, 1054 (2007) ("[A]n order denying reconsideration is not appealable."), disapproved of on other grounds by AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010). Second, to the extent, if any, the notice of appeal can be construed as challenging the underlying order regarding valuation of property, that order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). And no other statute or court rule allows for an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) INTA egg#D -31.103 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). This court lacks jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

111 66-6174-71; Parra guirre

4—0 Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Tamatha Schreinert, District Judge, Family Court Division Donald R. Schricker Bittner Legal LLC Washoe District Court Clerk

(47 ) 1947A 4Z9. 2